Bonaparte Disaster Victim Identification System
Society is increasingly aware of the possibility of a mass disaster. Recent examples are the WTC attacks, the tsunami, and various airplane crashes.
In such an event, the recovery and identification of the remains of the victims is of great importance, both for humanitarian as well as legal reasons.
Disaster victim identification (DVI), i.e. the identification of victims of a mass disaster, is greatly facilitated by the advent of modern DNA technology.
In forensic laboratories, DNA profiles can be recorded from small samples of body remains which may otherwise be unidentifiable.
The identification task is the match of the unidentified victim with a reported missing person. This is often complicated by the fact that the match has
to be made in an indirect way. This is the case when there is no reliable reference material of the missing person. In these cases DNA profiles
can be taken from relatives. Since their profiles are statistically related to the profile of the missing person (first degree family members share about half of their DNA)
an indirect match can be made.
In cases with one victim, identification is a reasonable straightforward task for forensic researchers. In the case of a few victims,
the puzzle to match the victims and the missing persons is often still doable by hand (either by using a spread sheet or with software
tools available on the internet). However, large scale DVI is infeasible this way and an automated routine is indispensible for forensic
institutes that need to be prepared for DVI.
The purpose of the Bonaparte software
Forensic researchers need a tool to deal with mass fatality incidents in a transparent, consistent and efficient way.
Efficiency is important since the number of possible combinations that researches have to calculate grows very quickly: O(n2).
Consider a case with 10 victims with their 10 putative pedigrees. This results in just 100 combinations,
but 100 victims with their 100 pedigrees yields 10,000 combinations.
And then these samples have not even been checked against each other (4,950 combinations) or checked for contamination (100 × the number of elimination profiles).
An automated system also performs each calculation in exactly the same way and eliminates the human-error factor.
The Bonaparte system is "transparent" it is not a black box where data is fed into and the results pour out. The models
implemented in Bonaparte are well documented and available to end users.
Bonaparte uses statistical graphical models; the so-called Bayesian networks.

